 |

March 7, 2005
Statement of Clean Air
Council during Press Conference Announcing Sherwin-Williams'
Acceptance of Air Quality Standards
Joseph Otis Minott, Esq.,
Executive Director, Clean Air Council:
"Sherwin-Williams'
decision to drop its challenge to Pennsylvania's air quality
regulations means a great deal for public health across
the state. Reducing the emissions of volatile organic compounds
from paints, primers and similar products will help to reduce
the ozone smog pollution problem in our area. Children with
asthma, senior citizens with respiratory problems, and even
perfectly healthy adults who want to go out for a jog on
a hot afternoon are all adversely affected by ozone smog
pollution. It is good to see Sherwin-Williams will be taking
the public's well-being into account as it formulates its
products in the future.
"The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection deserves a lot of credit for making every effort
to work with Sherwin-Williams, short of reducing air quality
protections for the state's citizens. Today, Sherwin-Williams
has shown that concern over its bottom line does not outweigh
its respect for corporate responsibility and environmental
stewardship."
###
BACKGROUND: New environmental standards
are currently in effect in Pennsylvania limiting the emissions
of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from 48 different coating
categories, including paints, primers, stains and varnishes.
Pennsylvania's final architecture, industrial and maintenance
(AIM) coating standard was developed by the Department of
Environmental Protection, with favorable comments from Clean
Air Council, in order to reduce a form air pollution that
causes ozone smog pollution, which is damaging to public
health. Philadelphia and the surrounding counties do not
currently meet federal health-based air quality standards
for ozone smog pollution. The standard was approved by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and went into effect
on December 23, 2004. On January 20, 2005, Sherwin-Williams
petitioned EPA to reconsider and stay full approval of this
standard. The company also filed a Petition for Review in
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on January
21, 2005. The company agreed to drop these challenges during
a meeting this morning with the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Protection.
|
 |