|

May 5, 2005
Contact: Arthur Stamoulis,
215-567-4004 ext. 222
Pennsylvanians Object
to End of Forest Protections
Governor, Conservationists Criticize Bush Administration
Repeal of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule for National
Forests
Philadelphia, PA - Pennsylvania conservationists
and the Governor today announced their opposition to the
Bush administration's decision to strip protections for
National Forest roadless areas. A U.S. Forest Service policy
announced today repeals the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation
Rule, which prohibited most road-building and resource extraction
on 58.5 million acres of pristine national forestland across
the country, including 25,000 acres in Pennsylvania's Allegheny
National Forest.
"The roadless rule was in place to ensure that future
generations would have the same opportunity to use and enjoy
national forests as past generations have," said Arthur
Stamoulis, Field Organizer for the Heritage Forests Campaign,
a coalition of conservationists and outdoor enthusiasts.
"These unwise changes put some of the nation's most
pristine forestland at risk, potentially harming the legacy
we leave to our children and grandchildren."
Governor Edward G. Rendell, who urged
President Bush to uphold the Roadless Area Conservation
Rule, said, "The roadless rule represents a balanced
policy protecting 58.5 million acres of the nation's last
wild forests from activities that could change the character
of the land. It was finalized after years of scientific
study, 600 public hearings, and a record 1.6 comments in
support of the rule."
Under the new policy, state governors are now required to
petition the U.S. Forest Service with recommendations in
order for roadless areas to be considered for protection.
These petitions are nonbinding, and the Forest Service is
free to accept, reject or modify them. During a public comment
period held last fall, the American people submitted more
than 1.75 million comments urging the Administration to
abandon its plan and uphold the original roadless rule as
promised four years ago this week; this is on top of the
1.6 million comments in support of the rule during its initial
development. The total number of comments by Pennsylvanians
over the years in support of protecting roadless areas amount
to 112,179.
"The American people continue to
overwhelmingly support a single national policy protecting
all of our last wild forests," said David Masur, Executive
Director of PennEnvironment. "This new rule shows the
Bush administration's willingness to break promises, ignore
public input, and put America's natural heritage at risk
for the short term profit of its industry supporters."
Conservationists charge the timing of
today's action is suspect considering oral arguments were
heard this week in a Federal appeals court where efforts
to defend the original roadless rule against legal attacks
continue. The new roadless policy undermines this legal
defense. Conservationists contend the motivation for striking
the roadless rule down is to allow more logging, mining,
and drilling access on National Forests.
"Weakening protections for America's
national forests is not wise and is certainly not conservative,"
said Sandy Moser, President of the Pennsylvania Chapter
of REP America (Republicans for Environmental Protection).
"Roadless areas in Allegheny National Forest provide
critical wildlife habitat and are an important source of
clean drinking water in the state. The Forest Service's
changes to the roadless rule seem incredibly short-sighted."
"This rule change is bad for anglers
and hunters who care deeply about protecting fish and wildlife
habitats," said Padraic Farrell, an active local member
of Trout Unlimited. "Roadless areas protect trout and
salmon populations which are growing more scarce and have
already lost other protections."
The Roadless Rule was finalized in January
2001. Over the years of development of this rule, the Forest
Service received over 2.5 million comments in favor of the
rule. The rule protected 58.5 million acres nationwide while
allowing temporary road construction in order to fight wildfires,
ensure public safety, and protect forest health.
###
|